<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431991</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 29/2004-CE, as amended, was confined to Chapter 56 goods made of cotton and not of other textile materials. The nonwoven felt fabrics at issue contained only 56% cotton, with substantial acrylic, polyester, wool, nylon and viscose content, so they did not satisfy the notification condition. The dispute concerned eligibility to exemption, not tariff classification, and the General Rules of Interpretation could not be used to extend exemption beyond the notification wording. Following the earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case on the same product, the exemption claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 10:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1108 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431991</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 29/2004-CE, as amended, was confined to Chapter 56 goods made of cotton and not of other textile materials. The nonwoven felt fabrics at issue contained only 56% cotton, with substantial acrylic, polyester, wool, nylon and viscose content, so they did not satisfy the notification condition. The dispute concerned eligibility to exemption, not tariff classification, and the General Rules of Interpretation could not be used to extend exemption beyond the notification wording. Following the earlier decision in the appellant&#039;s own case on the same product, the exemption claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>