<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305805</link>
    <description>A Government Order issued under section 9(1)(a) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 reduced stamp duty on gift deeds executed by layout owners handing over layout roads to local authorities to a nominal sum. In that context, insisting on full stamp duty and retaining the deed without registration was not in accordance with law because the authority had to consider the scope of the concession and act on the owner&#039;s representation. The demand for higher duty was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be reconsidered in light of the Government Order, with a fresh order on the representation to be passed within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2022 20:49:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1668 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305805</link>
      <description>A Government Order issued under section 9(1)(a) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 reduced stamp duty on gift deeds executed by layout owners handing over layout roads to local authorities to a nominal sum. In that context, insisting on full stamp duty and retaining the deed without registration was not in accordance with law because the authority had to consider the scope of the concession and act on the owner&#039;s representation. The demand for higher duty was therefore unsustainable, and the matter had to be reconsidered in light of the Government Order, with a fresh order on the representation to be passed within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>