<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Compensation for BOT project pre-closure not classified as revenue receipt u/s 28(ii)(d), ruling favors assessee.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67320</link>
    <description>Nature of receipt - amount received by the assessee firm as a compensation for pre-closure of its BOT projects - Revenue or capital receipt - both the learned authorities have erred in law and on facts in invoking section 28(ii)(d) qua assessee’s impugned compensation thereby holding it as a revenue receipt. The assessee succeeds. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 15:02:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 15:02:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Compensation for BOT project pre-closure not classified as revenue receipt u/s 28(ii)(d), ruling favors assessee.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67320</link>
      <description>Nature of receipt - amount received by the assessee firm as a compensation for pre-closure of its BOT projects - Revenue or capital receipt - both the learned authorities have erred in law and on facts in invoking section 28(ii)(d) qua assessee’s impugned compensation thereby holding it as a revenue receipt. The assessee succeeds. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 15:02:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>