<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1091 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431974</link>
    <description>Retention of ownership in trademarks and brand names, coupled with only restricted, conditional and revocable user rights, means the consideration is royalty and not capital gains. The agreement preserved the proprietor&#039;s title; the licensee received use rights subject to brand-book conditions, territorial limits, non-assignment restrictions and termination on breach, so there was no sale, exchange, relinquishment or extinguishment of ownership rights. The payment therefore fell within royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12(3) of the India-Turkey tax treaty. Separate claims on treaty rate and set-off of royalty income against long-term capital loss were not examined and were remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1091 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431974</link>
      <description>Retention of ownership in trademarks and brand names, coupled with only restricted, conditional and revocable user rights, means the consideration is royalty and not capital gains. The agreement preserved the proprietor&#039;s title; the licensee received use rights subject to brand-book conditions, territorial limits, non-assignment restrictions and termination on breach, so there was no sale, exchange, relinquishment or extinguishment of ownership rights. The payment therefore fell within royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12(3) of the India-Turkey tax treaty. Separate claims on treaty rate and set-off of royalty income against long-term capital loss were not examined and were remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>