<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1090 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s grounds in a tax case, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring that of the Assessing Officer. The additions of trade payables and advance from customers above one lakh were reinstated due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper assessment procedures and adherence to legal provisions in determining tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1090 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s grounds in a tax case, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and restoring that of the Assessing Officer. The additions of trade payables and advance from customers above one lakh were reinstated due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper assessment procedures and adherence to legal provisions in determining tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>