<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1082 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431965</link>
    <description>Foreign tax credit could not be denied merely because Form 67 was filed after the return due date, as Rule 128(9) requires timely filing but does not state that delay extinguishes the substantive credit entitlement. The treaty framework under Article 25 of the India-USA DTAA and the principle that a procedural lapse should not defeat an otherwise established foreign tax liability supported the taxpayer&#039;s claim, so the revenue&#039;s disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1082 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431965</link>
      <description>Foreign tax credit could not be denied merely because Form 67 was filed after the return due date, as Rule 128(9) requires timely filing but does not state that delay extinguishes the substantive credit entitlement. The treaty framework under Article 25 of the India-USA DTAA and the principle that a procedural lapse should not defeat an otherwise established foreign tax liability supported the taxpayer&#039;s claim, so the revenue&#039;s disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>