<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1965 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305789</link>
    <description>A direction for CBI investigation in writ jurisdiction is an extraordinary remedy, available only on a clear prima facie showing of necessity in exceptional circumstances such as credibility concerns, national interest, or enforcement of fundamental rights. The Court stated that disputes over a religious trust&#039;s property, trustee powers under the trust deed and the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Act, 1950, and the need for prior sanction and judicial approval for transfer were essentially civil in nature. It further noted that the High Court relied on disputed facts and broad allegations of fraud without adequate foundation and without the usual prior approach to local authorities. On that basis, the CBI direction was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:08:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1965 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305789</link>
      <description>A direction for CBI investigation in writ jurisdiction is an extraordinary remedy, available only on a clear prima facie showing of necessity in exceptional circumstances such as credibility concerns, national interest, or enforcement of fundamental rights. The Court stated that disputes over a religious trust&#039;s property, trustee powers under the trust deed and the Bihar Hindu Religious Trust Act, 1950, and the need for prior sanction and judicial approval for transfer were essentially civil in nature. It further noted that the High Court relied on disputed facts and broad allegations of fraud without adequate foundation and without the usual prior approach to local authorities. On that basis, the CBI direction was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>