https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305786 Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allows an arbitral award challenge within three months, with condonation only up to a further thirty days and not beyond. A filing stops limitation only if it is a properly instituted petition; on the stated facts, the alleged initial filings were treated as non-est because mandatory requirements such as signed pleadings, attested affidavits, proper vakalatnama, court fees, caveat report, and other compliances were absent or uncured. The explanation also failed to show sufficient cause for the entire delay. The challenge was therefore time-barred and the request for condonation failed. en-us Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:08:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305786 Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allows an arbitral award challenge within three months, with condonation only up to a further thirty days and not beyond. A filing stops limitation only if it is a properly instituted petition; on the stated facts, the alleged initial filings were treated as non-est because mandatory requirements such as signed pleadings, attested affidavits, proper vakalatnama, court fees, caveat report, and other compliances were absent or uncured. The explanation also failed to show sufficient cause for the entire delay. The challenge was therefore time-barred and the request for condonation failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305786