<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 176 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the rejection of their remission claim by the Commissioner. The Tribunal determined that the destruction of the cloth due to the factory being set ablaze by a large mob during riots constituted an unavoidable accident, making the appellant eligible for remission. The Tribunal emphasized that the Rule applied to goods destroyed by unavoidable accidents, not just natural causes. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the acceptance of the remission claim by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 176 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee against the rejection of their remission claim by the Commissioner. The Tribunal determined that the destruction of the cloth due to the factory being set ablaze by a large mob during riots constituted an unavoidable accident, making the appellant eligible for remission. The Tribunal emphasized that the Rule applied to goods destroyed by unavoidable accidents, not just natural causes. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed. The Tribunal also rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the acceptance of the remission claim by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>