<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1068 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431951</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order refusing duty drawback under S.S.No. 85.35, remanding the case for reconsideration by the Appellate Authority. The Court emphasized the need to consider a previous order classifying the goods under S.S.No. 85.37, which was not addressed in the impugned order, causing prejudice to the Petitioner. The Court instructed expedited proceedings to address delays resulting from the remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1068 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431951</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order refusing duty drawback under S.S.No. 85.35, remanding the case for reconsideration by the Appellate Authority. The Court emphasized the need to consider a previous order classifying the goods under S.S.No. 85.37, which was not addressed in the impugned order, causing prejudice to the Petitioner. The Court instructed expedited proceedings to address delays resulting from the remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>