<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1065 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431948</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the statutory deposit requirement under section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite seeking a waiver, the Tribunal clarified its lack of jurisdiction to modify the pre-deposit amount, directing the appellant to obtain orders from the High Court. The appellant&#039;s repeated non-appearance in hearings and failure to file a writ petition or make the pre-deposit led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of the deposit requirement, citing case laws and highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory provisions, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1065 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431948</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the statutory deposit requirement under section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite seeking a waiver, the Tribunal clarified its lack of jurisdiction to modify the pre-deposit amount, directing the appellant to obtain orders from the High Court. The appellant&#039;s repeated non-appearance in hearings and failure to file a writ petition or make the pre-deposit led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of the deposit requirement, citing case laws and highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory provisions, ultimately resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>