<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1063 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431946</link>
    <description>Imported goods were found to be materially similar to those covered in an earlier adjudication involving the same supplier, so the Tribunal held that the matter required fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority rather than final determination at that stage. The impugned orders were set aside and the dispute was remanded for a fresh order, leaving the substantive questions on exemption and classification open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2022 11:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1063 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431946</link>
      <description>Imported goods were found to be materially similar to those covered in an earlier adjudication involving the same supplier, so the Tribunal held that the matter required fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority rather than final determination at that stage. The impugned orders were set aside and the dispute was remanded for a fresh order, leaving the substantive questions on exemption and classification open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>