<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1055 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431938</link>
    <description>Transfer or registration of secured assets during an operative moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is unenforceable. A sale certificate issued under a private treaty remained subject to compulsory registration and stamp duty requirements, and registration completed after the moratorium breach could not confer any right, title, or interest on the purchaser. A plea of good faith did not cure a transfer made in violation of the insolvency restraint. The existence of a remedy under the SARFAESI Act did not bar insolvency jurisdiction where the grievance was breach of moratorium, and Section 60(5) continued to govern the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1055 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431938</link>
      <description>Transfer or registration of secured assets during an operative moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is unenforceable. A sale certificate issued under a private treaty remained subject to compulsory registration and stamp duty requirements, and registration completed after the moratorium breach could not confer any right, title, or interest on the purchaser. A plea of good faith did not cure a transfer made in violation of the insolvency restraint. The existence of a remedy under the SARFAESI Act did not bar insolvency jurisdiction where the grievance was breach of moratorium, and Section 60(5) continued to govern the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>