https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431925 Pre-arrest protection was found justified because the petitioner had joined investigation pursuant to the earlier order and the State ed that custodial interrogation was not required. On that basis, the conditions for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were treated as satisfied, and the interim protection was made absolute. The petitioner remained bound to comply with the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. en-us Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431925 Pre-arrest protection was found justified because the petitioner had joined investigation pursuant to the earlier order and the State ed that custodial interrogation was not required. On that basis, the conditions for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 were treated as satisfied, and the interim protection was made absolute. The petitioner remained bound to comply with the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431925