https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305781 Civil court jurisdiction was held not to be excluded for challenging ryotwari patta proceedings under the Estates Abolition Act where the statute did not provide a conclusive forum for title-like disputes, so the civil suit was maintainable. An earlier writ petition confined to limited supervisory review and based on the parties' agreement on localisation did not finally decide the substantive identity or extent of the patta land, so it did not operate as res judicata. Because the evidence on survey correlation, extent, and possible communal poramboke remained conflicting and incomplete, the matter required remand for fresh factual enquiry on the precise land entitled to patta. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305781 Civil court jurisdiction was held not to be excluded for challenging ryotwari patta proceedings under the Estates Abolition Act where the statute did not provide a conclusive forum for title-like disputes, so the civil suit was maintainable. An earlier writ petition confined to limited supervisory review and based on the parties' agreement on localisation did not finally decide the substantive identity or extent of the patta land, so it did not operate as res judicata. Because the evidence on survey correlation, extent, and possible communal poramboke remained conflicting and incomplete, the matter required remand for fresh factual enquiry on the precise land entitled to patta. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305781