https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31312 The tribunal held that supplementary services provided by the appellant were liable to service tax throughout the disputed period. The extended limitation period was rightly invoked, and penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were justified. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for re-quantification of the service tax liability and re-determination of the penalty under Section 78. The quantum of penalty under Section 76 was upheld. en-us Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Apr 2014 12:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31312 The tribunal held that supplementary services provided by the appellant were liable to service tax throughout the disputed period. The extended limitation period was rightly invoked, and penalties under Sections 76 and 78 were justified. The case was remanded to the Commissioner for re-quantification of the service tax liability and re-determination of the penalty under Section 78. The quantum of penalty under Section 76 was upheld. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31312