https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305780 Limitation under the Code of Criminal Procedure began when the offence first came to the complainant's knowledge, under Section 469(1)(b), with the starting day excluded under Section 469(2). On the record, the complainant's own notice showed awareness of the alleged violation on 8 July 1986, or at the latest by 29 July 1986, while the complaints were filed only in August and September 1988, beyond the one-year limitation period. No request for extension under Section 473 was made. The concurrent findings on the date of knowledge were supported by the record, so the prosecution was held time-barred and the appeal failed. en-us Tue, 07 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:06:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305780 Limitation under the Code of Criminal Procedure began when the offence first came to the complainant's knowledge, under Section 469(1)(b), with the starting day excluded under Section 469(2). On the record, the complainant's own notice showed awareness of the alleged violation on 8 July 1986, or at the latest by 29 July 1986, while the complaints were filed only in August and September 1988, beyond the one-year limitation period. No request for extension under Section 473 was made. The concurrent findings on the date of knowledge were supported by the record, so the prosecution was held time-barred and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 07 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305780