https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431914 A bail condition requiring deposit of 10% of the alleged liability was not interfered with because the applicant had earlier expressed readiness before the Sessions Court to make that deposit and could not later resile from that position. The HC noted that the relied-on Supreme Court decisions did not assist on these facts, and that the seriousness of the alleged offence, the evidence, and the attributed complicity justified continued imposition of the condition. Bail relief was therefore declined at that stage, and the Sessions Court's condition was upheld. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431914 A bail condition requiring deposit of 10% of the alleged liability was not interfered with because the applicant had earlier expressed readiness before the Sessions Court to make that deposit and could not later resile from that position. The HC noted that the relied-on Supreme Court decisions did not assist on these facts, and that the seriousness of the alleged offence, the evidence, and the attributed complicity justified continued imposition of the condition. Bail relief was therefore declined at that stage, and the Sessions Court's condition was upheld. Case-Laws GST Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431914