<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1019 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431902</link>
    <description>The court set aside the CBDT&#039;s order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing the Income Tax Return for AY 2011-12. The court directed the income tax authority to consider the claim for deduction under Section 80 IB(10) without considering the delay. The petitioner&#039;s application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act was upheld, emphasizing that technicalities should not hinder substantial justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 21:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1019 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431902</link>
      <description>The court set aside the CBDT&#039;s order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing the Income Tax Return for AY 2011-12. The court directed the income tax authority to consider the claim for deduction under Section 80 IB(10) without considering the delay. The petitioner&#039;s application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act was upheld, emphasizing that technicalities should not hinder substantial justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>