<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1014 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 6,00,000 made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The delay in filing the appeal due to the Covid-19 pandemic was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication. The authorities failed to discharge their onus, and the ld. CIT(A) was found to have erred in changing the provision of law without specific notice to the assessee. The order was pronounced on 21st December 2022 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1014 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 6,00,000 made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The delay in filing the appeal due to the Covid-19 pandemic was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication. The authorities failed to discharge their onus, and the ld. CIT(A) was found to have erred in changing the provision of law without specific notice to the assessee. The order was pronounced on 21st December 2022 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>