<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1000 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee, quashed the penalty order, and held that the show cause notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271AAB was vague and invalid. The Tribunal concluded that the income declared by the assessee was not undisclosed income and that the penalty under Section 271AAB was not sustainable. The appeal was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) sustaining the penalty was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1000 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the additional ground of appeal raised by the assessee, quashed the penalty order, and held that the show cause notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271AAB was vague and invalid. The Tribunal concluded that the income declared by the assessee was not undisclosed income and that the penalty under Section 271AAB was not sustainable. The appeal was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) sustaining the penalty was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>