<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 988 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431871</link>
    <description>The High Court recorded the respondents&#039; undertaking that the petitioner&#039;s representation dated 9 August 2021 would be decided on merits in accordance with law within four weeks and the decision communicated to the petitioner. On that basis, it disposed of the writ petition and preserved the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue available legal remedies if the decision is adverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 988 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431871</link>
      <description>The High Court recorded the respondents&#039; undertaking that the petitioner&#039;s representation dated 9 August 2021 would be decided on merits in accordance with law within four weeks and the decision communicated to the petitioner. On that basis, it disposed of the writ petition and preserved the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue available legal remedies if the decision is adverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>