https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431863 Further investigation under the Competition Act, 2002 could not be treated as a free-standing power to reopen a matter after a Director General report finding contravention; Regulation 20(6) of the 2009 Regulations operated only in aid of the statutory scheme under Section 26(7). A supplementary investigation obtained on that basis was therefore beyond jurisdiction, and the closure order founded on it, together with all subsequent proceedings, was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Competition Commission for fresh consideration on the original Director General report after hearing all concerned. en-us Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431863 Further investigation under the Competition Act, 2002 could not be treated as a free-standing power to reopen a matter after a Director General report finding contravention; Regulation 20(6) of the 2009 Regulations operated only in aid of the statutory scheme under Section 26(7). A supplementary investigation obtained on that basis was therefore beyond jurisdiction, and the closure order founded on it, together with all subsequent proceedings, was set aside. The matter was remitted to the Competition Commission for fresh consideration on the original Director General report after hearing all concerned. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431863