<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 979 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431862</link>
    <description>Limitation for a Section 7 insolvency application is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and a written acknowledgment made before expiry of the limitation period extends time. The text states that restructuring letters, consent terms, balance-sheet entries and similar acknowledgments kept the claim within limitation, and that a recovery certificate or decree could give rise to a fresh cause of action if the debt remained unpaid. It further notes that default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is non-payment of a due debt, and that continuing liability evidenced by restructuring correspondence and recovery proceedings supported the finding of default. The NPA date was not treated as conclusive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2022 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 979 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431862</link>
      <description>Limitation for a Section 7 insolvency application is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and a written acknowledgment made before expiry of the limitation period extends time. The text states that restructuring letters, consent terms, balance-sheet entries and similar acknowledgments kept the claim within limitation, and that a recovery certificate or decree could give rise to a fresh cause of action if the debt remained unpaid. It further notes that default under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is non-payment of a due debt, and that continuing liability evidenced by restructuring correspondence and recovery proceedings supported the finding of default. The NPA date was not treated as conclusive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>