https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431843 A candidate appointed from the wait-list pursuant to binding judicial directions was entitled to notional seniority and consequential service benefits from the select-list stage, because the appointment flowed from the earlier court mandate and not from an ordinary earlier selection. The appointee was therefore to be placed at the end of the select list for seniority, while salary remained payable only from the date of assuming charge. Rule 10 of the recruitment rules did not defeat this relief on the facts, as the specific directions governing the appointment controlled the entitlement. The writ petitions failed and the Tribunal's grant of notional seniority with related service benefits was affirmed. en-us Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2022 09:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431843 A candidate appointed from the wait-list pursuant to binding judicial directions was entitled to notional seniority and consequential service benefits from the select-list stage, because the appointment flowed from the earlier court mandate and not from an ordinary earlier selection. The appointee was therefore to be placed at the end of the select list for seniority, while salary remained payable only from the date of assuming charge. Rule 10 of the recruitment rules did not defeat this relief on the facts, as the specific directions governing the appointment controlled the entitlement. The writ petitions failed and the Tribunal's grant of notional seniority with related service benefits was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431843