<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1340 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under section 56(2)(viib), affirming that the provision could not be applied retrospectively and that the share premium valuation was justified. The appeals filed by the Revenue for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:08:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1340 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions made by the AO under section 56(2)(viib), affirming that the provision could not be applied retrospectively and that the share premium valuation was justified. The appeals filed by the Revenue for both assessment years were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>