https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305755 The Court upheld the trial Court's decision to dismiss the applications for reopening evidence and examination of a promissory note by a Handwriting Expert. The petitioner's attempt to establish the ink's age was considered unlikely to yield useful results due to the short time gap and complexities involved in determining ink age. The Court emphasized that expert opinions on ink age are inconclusive and do not replace substantive evidence. As a result, the Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed, and any pending miscellaneous petitions were ordered to be closed. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:07:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305755 The Court upheld the trial Court's decision to dismiss the applications for reopening evidence and examination of a promissory note by a Handwriting Expert. The petitioner's attempt to establish the ink's age was considered unlikely to yield useful results due to the short time gap and complexities involved in determining ink age. The Court emphasized that expert opinions on ink age are inconclusive and do not replace substantive evidence. As a result, the Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed, and any pending miscellaneous petitions were ordered to be closed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305755