https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305752 Concurrent findings that an agreement to sell was duly executed and earnest money was paid, supported by the scribe and attesting witnesses, were treated as reliable and were not reopened in second appeal. The defence version failed for want of convincing evidence, and the alleged fiduciary relationship was not proved so as to weaken the claim for specific performance. The Court also noted that no pleaded hardship under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act was shown to justify refusal of discretionary relief. The decree for specific performance was therefore upheld and the concurrent decrees remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:07:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305752 Concurrent findings that an agreement to sell was duly executed and earnest money was paid, supported by the scribe and attesting witnesses, were treated as reliable and were not reopened in second appeal. The defence version failed for want of convincing evidence, and the alleged fiduciary relationship was not proved so as to weaken the claim for specific performance. The Court also noted that no pleaded hardship under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act was shown to justify refusal of discretionary relief. The decree for specific performance was therefore upheld and the concurrent decrees remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305752