https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305760 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to participate in proceedings under Section 129 of the GST Act. The Court emphasized the strict enforcement of rules to prevent tax evasion and the need for aggrieved parties to seek redress through the appellate authority. The judgment underscored the importance of compliance with statutory provisions and the availability of appellate remedies for dissatisfied parties. The petitioner was allowed to appeal against the adjudication orders, with a stay against the invocation of the bank guarantee for two months from the judgment date. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305760 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, directing the petitioner to participate in proceedings under Section 129 of the GST Act. The Court emphasized the strict enforcement of rules to prevent tax evasion and the need for aggrieved parties to seek redress through the appellate authority. The judgment underscored the importance of compliance with statutory provisions and the availability of appellate remedies for dissatisfied parties. The petitioner was allowed to appeal against the adjudication orders, with a stay against the invocation of the bank guarantee for two months from the judgment date. Case-Laws GST Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305760