<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1675 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305759</link>
    <description>Appellate interference with an interim order concerning a GST TRAN-1 upload grievance was declined because the order contained no specific directions and no manifest error was shown. The Kerala HC noted that the appellants could place their factual distinction and prior verification materials before the Single Judge and seek modification of the interim order. As an effective remedy remained available before the court that passed the order, appellate correction was unwarranted. The interim order was left undisturbed, and the challenge failed, while the appellants were left at liberty to pursue modification before the Single Judge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1675 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305759</link>
      <description>Appellate interference with an interim order concerning a GST TRAN-1 upload grievance was declined because the order contained no specific directions and no manifest error was shown. The Kerala HC noted that the appellants could place their factual distinction and prior verification materials before the Single Judge and seek modification of the interim order. As an effective remedy remained available before the court that passed the order, appellate correction was unwarranted. The interim order was left undisturbed, and the challenge failed, while the appellants were left at liberty to pursue modification before the Single Judge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>