https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305765 The case involved issues regarding the applicability of AV Singh Committee recommendations to all streams, acceptance of the "Command Exit Model" by the Central Government, legality and fairness in the allocation of vacancies to Arms Support, whether Officers in Arms, Arms Support, and Services constitute a single cadre, and legitimate expectation of batch parity in promotions among officers. The Court partly allowed the appeals, directing the Government to create 141 additional posts of Colonel for the Combat Support stream for retrospective promotions from 2009 to 2014, with each party bearing its own costs. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:07:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305765 The case involved issues regarding the applicability of AV Singh Committee recommendations to all streams, acceptance of the "Command Exit Model" by the Central Government, legality and fairness in the allocation of vacancies to Arms Support, whether Officers in Arms, Arms Support, and Services constitute a single cadre, and legitimate expectation of batch parity in promotions among officers. The Court partly allowed the appeals, directing the Government to create 141 additional posts of Colonel for the Combat Support stream for retrospective promotions from 2009 to 2014, with each party bearing its own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305765