https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305764 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 on the basis of its own averments alone, without relying on the defendant's written statement or documents. On a meaningful reading of the plaint, the plaintiffs admitted that their father had been adopted by a registered deed in 1942, and the suit properties were pleaded to have been acquired after that adoption. The adoption severed his status in the natural family, so no enforceable coparcenary share or other right in the suit properties was disclosed. The plaint therefore disclosed no valid cause of action and was also treated as barred by limitation, so rejection was upheld. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2022 21:07:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305764 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 on the basis of its own averments alone, without relying on the defendant's written statement or documents. On a meaningful reading of the plaint, the plaintiffs admitted that their father had been adopted by a registered deed in 1942, and the suit properties were pleaded to have been acquired after that adoption. The adoption severed his status in the natural family, so no enforceable coparcenary share or other right in the suit properties was disclosed. The plaint therefore disclosed no valid cause of action and was also treated as barred by limitation, so rejection was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305764