<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 566 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305743</link>
    <description>A prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can begin only after the drawer fails to pay within 15 days of receipt or deemed receipt of the statutory notice. Because the complaint was filed before expiry of that statutory period, the cause of action had not arisen and the complaint was premature. The criminal proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 566 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305743</link>
      <description>A prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can begin only after the drawer fails to pay within 15 days of receipt or deemed receipt of the statutory notice. Because the complaint was filed before expiry of that statutory period, the cause of action had not arisen and the complaint was premature. The criminal proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>