https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305732 The court held that the complaints were premature as they were filed before the expiry of the 15-day period mandated by Clause (c) of Section 138 of the N.I. Act. It was clarified that the cause of action arises only after the 15-day period, making any complaint filed before that period premature and not maintainable. Consequently, the court allowed the revisional applications, quashed the criminal proceedings, discharged the accused from their bail bonds, and directed the concerned Judicial Magistrate to take necessary action. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2022 15:56:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305732 The court held that the complaints were premature as they were filed before the expiry of the 15-day period mandated by Clause (c) of Section 138 of the N.I. Act. It was clarified that the cause of action arises only after the 15-day period, making any complaint filed before that period premature and not maintainable. Consequently, the court allowed the revisional applications, quashed the criminal proceedings, discharged the accused from their bail bonds, and directed the concerned Judicial Magistrate to take necessary action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305732