<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 2090 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the additions of Rs. 2,65,00,000/- under Section 68 and Rs. 1,32,500/- for commission. The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to establish the necessary criteria of identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, in line with the principles set out by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 2090 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the additions of Rs. 2,65,00,000/- under Section 68 and Rs. 1,32,500/- for commission. The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to establish the necessary criteria of identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, in line with the principles set out by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>