<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1996 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305722</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of both the Assessee and the Revenue partly, setting aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2011-12 due to lack of opportunity for rebuttal and examination of advertisement revenues. The issues were restored to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication denovo with directions to provide evidence to the Assessee. The Miscellaneous Petition by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1996 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305722</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of both the Assessee and the Revenue partly, setting aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2011-12 due to lack of opportunity for rebuttal and examination of advertisement revenues. The issues were restored to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication denovo with directions to provide evidence to the Assessee. The Miscellaneous Petition by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>