https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305718 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a civil revision petition seeking scientific examination of a promissory note, citing impracticality in the absence of available scientific experts. The petitioner's request was denied based on the argument that without expert support, determining details such as the dates of writing on the note would be futile. The Court relied on precedents and judgments from various High Courts and the Supreme Court emphasizing the impracticality of sending documents for expert analysis when relevant experts are unavailable. The dismissal was upheld, highlighting the impracticability of the petitioner's application without scientific expert support. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:45:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305718 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a civil revision petition seeking scientific examination of a promissory note, citing impracticality in the absence of available scientific experts. The petitioner's request was denied based on the argument that without expert support, determining details such as the dates of writing on the note would be futile. The Court relied on precedents and judgments from various High Courts and the Supreme Court emphasizing the impracticality of sending documents for expert analysis when relevant experts are unavailable. The dismissal was upheld, highlighting the impracticability of the petitioner's application without scientific expert support. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305718