<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 958 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431841</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging registration cancellation. The court found the first appellate authority&#039;s order mechanically dismissive without proper consideration of appeal grounds. HC directed a fresh review of the appeal, emphasizing fair treatment of small traders and natural justice principles. The ruling highlighted the need for sensitivity in tax compliance proceedings and avoiding punitive actions for minor procedural delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 958 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431841</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging registration cancellation. The court found the first appellate authority&#039;s order mechanically dismissive without proper consideration of appeal grounds. HC directed a fresh review of the appeal, emphasizing fair treatment of small traders and natural justice principles. The ruling highlighted the need for sensitivity in tax compliance proceedings and avoiding punitive actions for minor procedural delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>