<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 946 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431829</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and reinstating the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The decision was based on the timing of the transaction and the absence of a requirement to deduct tax at source, concluding that the disallowance was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 946 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431829</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chennai allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reversing the CIT(A)&#039;s order and reinstating the addition under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2008-09. The decision was based on the timing of the transaction and the absence of a requirement to deduct tax at source, concluding that the disallowance was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>