<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 929 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431812</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the gains from the sale of properties as business income, considering the assets&#039; origin and their role in the appellant&#039;s business activities. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the properties acquired in exchange for receivables were to be viewed as business assets, leading to the taxation of gains as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:44:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 929 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431812</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the gains from the sale of properties as business income, considering the assets&#039; origin and their role in the appellant&#039;s business activities. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the properties acquired in exchange for receivables were to be viewed as business assets, leading to the taxation of gains as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>