<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 918 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and directed the Adjudicating Authority to admit the Section 9 Application under IBC within one month and proceed in accordance with the law. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s defence was deemed untenable, and the Tribunal found it lacking merit as a pre-existing dispute. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s conclusion of a serious dispute was considered erroneous, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 918 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and directed the Adjudicating Authority to admit the Section 9 Application under IBC within one month and proceed in accordance with the law. The Corporate Debtor&#039;s defence was deemed untenable, and the Tribunal found it lacking merit as a pre-existing dispute. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s conclusion of a serious dispute was considered erroneous, leading to the appeal&#039;s success.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>