<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 44 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31286</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that supervision of installation and erection does not constitute providing Consulting Engineering Services. The appeal was allowed based on a previous decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=69935" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 44 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31286</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that supervision of installation and erection does not constitute providing Consulting Engineering Services. The appeal was allowed based on a previous decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>