https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431792 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, affirming the Settlement Commission's order. The Petitioner's request for cum-duty price benefit was rejected due to allegations of clandestine removal and fraudulent clearance of goods, supported by the use of invoices from a defunct entity. The Court upheld the Commission's decision, emphasizing limited judicial review scope in settlement proceedings and citing relevant legal precedents. The denial of cum-duty price benefit was justified based on the findings of unauthorized clearances and fraudulent practices. en-us Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431792 The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, affirming the Settlement Commission's order. The Petitioner's request for cum-duty price benefit was rejected due to allegations of clandestine removal and fraudulent clearance of goods, supported by the use of invoices from a defunct entity. The Court upheld the Commission's decision, emphasizing limited judicial review scope in settlement proceedings and citing relevant legal precedents. The denial of cum-duty price benefit was justified based on the findings of unauthorized clearances and fraudulent practices. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431792