<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 892 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431775</link>
    <description>A Section 7 insolvency application could not be maintained against a corporate guarantor that was, at the time of filing, registered as a financial service provider and therefore outside the definition of a corporate person. The RBI registration showed the entity fell outside the statutory class amenable to CIRP, and later cancellation of that registration did not cure the original defect. Because the proceeding was initiated against an entity beyond the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s jurisdiction, the insolvency commencement order was void and non est. The appeal succeeded, the insolvency order was set aside, and the respondent was left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 892 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431775</link>
      <description>A Section 7 insolvency application could not be maintained against a corporate guarantor that was, at the time of filing, registered as a financial service provider and therefore outside the definition of a corporate person. The RBI registration showed the entity fell outside the statutory class amenable to CIRP, and later cancellation of that registration did not cure the original defect. Because the proceeding was initiated against an entity beyond the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s jurisdiction, the insolvency commencement order was void and non est. The appeal succeeded, the insolvency order was set aside, and the respondent was left free to proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>