<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 871 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431754</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under section 50C of the Act, amounting to Rs. 85,36,200, based on the 3rd proviso to section 50C(1) where the difference between the guideline value and sale consideration was less than 10%. The ITAT considered the amendment in section 50C(1) as curative and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents and holding that no addition should be made in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 18:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 871 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431754</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under section 50C of the Act, amounting to Rs. 85,36,200, based on the 3rd proviso to section 50C(1) where the difference between the guideline value and sale consideration was less than 10%. The ITAT considered the amendment in section 50C(1) as curative and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing precedents and holding that no addition should be made in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>