<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2289 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305706</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Appeals filed by the Appellant-Assessee, emphasizing that the issues raised did not meet the criteria for invoking Section 260-A of the Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of fair and quick judicial dispensation in international trade cases and reiterated the need for objective and transparent comparables selection in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2289 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305706</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Appeals filed by the Appellant-Assessee, emphasizing that the issues raised did not meet the criteria for invoking Section 260-A of the Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of fair and quick judicial dispensation in international trade cases and reiterated the need for objective and transparent comparables selection in transfer pricing assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305706</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>