https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305707 The Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petitions, upholding the validity of the Jal Nigam's circular dated 07.04.2015. The Court ruled that the petitioners could not claim reinstatement or regular appointment without meeting eligibility conditions and clarified that the "equal pay for equal work" doctrine did not apply. Services of already engaged workmen remained unaffected by the order. en-us Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:11:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305707 The Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petitions, upholding the validity of the Jal Nigam's circular dated 07.04.2015. The Court ruled that the petitioners could not claim reinstatement or regular appointment without meeting eligibility conditions and clarified that the "equal pay for equal work" doctrine did not apply. Services of already engaged workmen remained unaffected by the order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305707