<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 660 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305695</link>
    <description>The plaintiff filed a suit for partition of family properties, claiming a share. The trial court granted shares in some properties but excluded others. The plaintiff failed to prove certain properties were joint family assets. Evidence of family income and contributions to the family business was found lacking. The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal due to insufficient evidence. Each party was ordered to bear their costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=699197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 660 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305695</link>
      <description>The plaintiff filed a suit for partition of family properties, claiming a share. The trial court granted shares in some properties but excluded others. The plaintiff failed to prove certain properties were joint family assets. Evidence of family income and contributions to the family business was found lacking. The court upheld the trial court&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal due to insufficient evidence. Each party was ordered to bear their costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>