https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305692 The Supreme Court held that Yashodamma was validly married to K Doddananjundaiah despite discrepancies in the marriage documents. It clarified that Dinesh, born after the Hindu Succession Act, would inherit under Section 8, not as a coparcener. The property of K Doddananjundaiah was deemed separate, and Dinesh and the daughters were recognized as equal heirs. The Court allowed the appeals, granting the appellants a 1/3rd share in the properties, overturning the lower courts' decision of 1/10th share, with no costs incurred. en-us Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305692 The Supreme Court held that Yashodamma was validly married to K Doddananjundaiah despite discrepancies in the marriage documents. It clarified that Dinesh, born after the Hindu Succession Act, would inherit under Section 8, not as a coparcener. The property of K Doddananjundaiah was deemed separate, and Dinesh and the daughters were recognized as equal heirs. The Court allowed the appeals, granting the appellants a 1/3rd share in the properties, overturning the lower courts' decision of 1/10th share, with no costs incurred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305692