https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305687 The Tribunal held that the assessee should be characterized as a provider of non-binding investment advisory and related support services, not as a KPO. It directed the inclusion of specific companies as comparables in the Transfer Pricing analysis and excluded others. The Tribunal remitted the matter for fresh computation to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer. The Stay Application became infructuous due to the partial allowance of the assessee's appeal. The order was pronounced on 04.09.2020. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:04:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305687 The Tribunal held that the assessee should be characterized as a provider of non-binding investment advisory and related support services, not as a KPO. It directed the inclusion of specific companies as comparables in the Transfer Pricing analysis and excluded others. The Tribunal remitted the matter for fresh computation to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer. The Stay Application became infructuous due to the partial allowance of the assessee's appeal. The order was pronounced on 04.09.2020. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 04 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=305687